|
Posted by Too_Many_Tools on March 31, 2007, 4:27 pm
On Mar 27, 12:19 pm, Idontthin...@nospam.com (Mike_in_SD) wrote:
> n...@animats.com (John Nagle) wrote in <ub%Nh.9392$JZ3.860
> @newssvr13.news.prodigy.net>:
> >Wayne C. Gramlich wrote:
> >> Too_Many_Tools wrote:
> >>> I find this discussion group to be informative but very slow.
> >>> Since I assume that there are other more active discussion groups,
> >>> where are the ones that you visit?
> >>> Links please.
> Once you have adopted a specific microprocessor (basic stamp, avr,
> basic atom .. whatever ) you will find a wealth of information and
> exchange of ideas on the forums usually found at the OEM sites for
> those chips.
> http://forums.parallax.com/forums/
> http://forums.basicmicro.net/
> But .. please dont confuse "slow" with "useless" when it comes
> to this group. Some of the greats hang out here and are always
> willing to help.
> Mike Amick
Thanks to Mike and others for their responses.
> But .. please dont confuse "slow" with "useless" when it comes
> to this group. Some of the greats hang out here and are always
> willing to help.
No I don't equate "slow" with "useless"....when the discussion group
is active the information is good.
BUT this discussion group IS slow and that is not good if one wants to
see the interest in robotics development to increase. I have steered a
number of people to this group and almost everyone has asked if this
group is dying off.
TMT
| 
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML site map
>
> Since I assume that there are other more active discussion groups,
> where are the ones that you visit?
>
> Links please.