|
Posted by Guy Macon on September 10, 2008, 1:59 pm
Kent Paul Dolan wrote:
>Erik Max Francis wrote:
> > Kent Paul Dolan wrote:
> > The problem with all this puffing is that your
> > original comment _did_ contain that implication.
>Only to a lunatic.
> > "Murray has been flogging his claim to have
> > 'solved A.I.' since long before computers with
> > capacities capable of doing any such thing were
> > available" implies pretty clearly that such
> > capacities are available now,
>Not to any sane person it doesn't.
I am sane, yet I also see in the quoted phrase "since
long before computers with capacities capable of doing
any such thing were available" the clear implication
that such computers are available now. The word "before"
implies an "after."
In my opinion, your use of insults is a clear sign that
you don't believe that you can win the argument on the
basis of evidence or logic.
--
Guy Macon
<http://www.GuyMacon.com/>
|