If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
|
Posted by Too_Many_Tools on January 2, 2006, 5:40 pm
Has anyone built an amateur version of the Martian rovers?
If so please supply links and a discussion of how you did.
Thanks
TMT
FYI...
Rovers Still Exploring Mars After 2 Years By ALICIA CHANG, AP Science
Writer
The warranty expired long ago on NASA's twin robots motoring around
Mars. These two golf cart-sized vehicles were only expected to last
three months.
In two years, they have traveled a total of seven miles. Not impressed?
Try keeping your car running in a climate where the average temperature
is 67 below zero and where dust devils can reach 100 mph.
"These rovers are living on borrowed time. We're so past warranty on
them," says Steven Squyres of Cornell University, the Mars mission's
principal researcher. "You try to push them hard every day because
we're living day-to-day."
The rover Spirit landed on Mars on Jan. 3, 2004, and Opportunity
followed on Jan. 24. Since then, they've set all sorts of records and
succeeded in the mission's main assignment: finding geologic evidence
that water once flowed on Mars.
Part of the reason for their long survival is pure luck. Their lives
were extended several times by dust devils that blew away dust that
covered their solar panels, restoring their ability to generate
electricity.
Like most Earth-bound vehicles, these identical robots have their own
personalities.
The overachieving Opportunity dazzled scientists from the start. It
eclipsed its twin by making the mission's first profound discovery -
evidence of water at or near the surface eons ago that could have
implications for life.
The rock-climbing Spirit went down in the history books by becoming the
first robot to scale an extraterrestrial hill. Last summer, it
completed a daredevil climb to the summit of Husband Hill - as tall
as the Statue of Liberty - despite fears that it might not survive
the weather.
The rovers haven't been all get-up and go - technical hiccups have at
times limited their activity, even from the start. At one point, Spirit
had a balky front wheel, but engineers overcame the problem by driving
it in reverse. Last spring, Opportunity got stuck hub-deep in sand
while trying to crest a foot-high dune, and was freed after weeks of
effort by the Earth-bound engineers.
The six-wheeled travelers, managed by NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory
in Pasadena, also are showing signs of aging. In November, a motor on
Opportunity's robotic arm stalled and the arm failed to extend while it
was surveying a rock outcrop. The engineers fixed that problem after
two weeks.
This mission is the first time any probe has extensively rolled across
Mars, whose rocky landscape is a dangerous place for man-made objects
to settle and roam.
There have been four previous Mars landings that succeeded. Of those,
NASA's stationary Viking 1 lander operated the longest, from 1976 to
1982. NASA's Sojourner was the first rover, but it stayed close to its
Pathfinder lander.
Spirit and Opportunity parachuted to opposite ends of Mars. Spirit
landed in Gusev Crater, a 90-mile-wide depression south of the Martian
equator. Opportunity followed three weeks later, touching down on
Meridiani Planum on the other side of the planet.
In two years, Spirit has traveled over three miles and beamed back
70,000 images including self-portraits and panoramas of the
rust-colored planet's surface. Opportunity has driven over four miles
and transmitted more than 58,000 images.
Three times NASA has extended the rovers' mission, spending an extra
$84 million on top of the $820 million original price tag.
While both rovers have discovered clues of ancient water, they also
have found evidence of a violent past that might have prevented some
life forms from emerging.
Piecing together a definitive history of Mars is far from over,
scientists say, as the rovers head to their next destinations to
explore more rocks and minerals.
Spirit recently descended Husband Hill and is driving toward a basin
that holds geologic promise. Opportunity is rolling to an enormous
depression known as Victoria Crater that is thought to hold more clues
about the planet's past.
"Rock layers are the barcode of Mars history," said John Grotzinger, a
science team member from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
"Every time we encounter new layers, it's another piece of the puzzle."
___
On the Net:
Mars Rovers: http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/home/index.html
|
|
Posted by Randy M. Dumse on January 2, 2006, 7:08 pm
> Has anyone built an amateur version of the Martian rovers?
Actually, did it professionally, but you can see the result at:
http://www.washingtonpavilion.org/ScienceDiscoveryCenter/events/newairspace.cfm
Worked with Exhibit Engineering and a couple other companies, we did the
micro inside. We used a PlugaPod(TM) and two NMIH-0050's, and executed
commands from a PC over a Bluetooth link. We implemented skid steering,
with timed turns. It had a separate video camera link, that sent back
pictures for the operator. Perhaps you can see from the set up, the
operator has no direct visual path to seem operation, and must work
through the wireless link when seated at the PC station.
--
Randy M. Dumse
www.newmicros.com
Caution: Objects in mirror are more confused than they appear.
|
|
Posted by Allen Foster on January 3, 2006, 9:39 am
Hi there,
That is pretty impressive work!
Does anyone know of any books that describe the rovers at an
engineering level. I've yet to come across a decent book that goes
into a decent depth in describing the systems, sensors and actuators
etc.
Maybe one doesn't exist but it would sure be interesting reading if
one did.
Allen.
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 18:08:27 -0600, "Randy M. Dumse"
>> Has anyone built an amateur version of the Martian rovers?
>Actually, did it professionally, but you can see the result at:
>http://www.washingtonpavilion.org/ScienceDiscoveryCenter/events/newairspace.cfm
>Worked with Exhibit Engineering and a couple other companies, we did the
>micro inside. We used a PlugaPod(TM) and two NMIH-0050's, and executed
>commands from a PC over a Bluetooth link. We implemented skid steering,
>with timed turns. It had a separate video camera link, that sent back
>pictures for the operator. Perhaps you can see from the set up, the
>operator has no direct visual path to seem operation, and must work
>through the wireless link when seated at the PC station.
|
|
Posted by Too_Many_Tools on January 3, 2006, 11:43 am
"Does anyone know of any books that describe the rovers at an
engineering level. I've yet to come across a decent book that goes
into a decent depth in describing the systems, sensors and actuators
etc. "
I have been looking for such information and it does not seem to be
available.
In today's NASA, I assume that with the outsourcing that has occurred
all such information is the property of the companies that have built
the Rover and therefore won't be released.
If so it is a shame, I for one really do not understand why there has
not been an increased interest in the Martian Rovers (note the lack of
response to this discussion). I find it to be one of the most
interesting robots around that is actually delivering on the promises
made by its program. I would think that there would be a strong
interest to build working models of it.
TMT
|
|
Posted by Allen Foster on January 3, 2006, 4:22 pm
Has anyone checked out this book;
Roving Mars: Spirit, Opportunity and the Exploration of the Red Planet
Steve Squyres
It is in the realm of pop-sci and will probably only touch on the
engineering aspects of the mssion but I think I'll have to order it
anyway.
Allen.
On 3 Jan 2006 08:43:57 -0800, "Too_Many_Tools"
>"Does anyone know of any books that describe the rovers at an
>engineering level. I've yet to come across a decent book that goes
>into a decent depth in describing the systems, sensors and actuators
>etc. "
>I have been looking for such information and it does not seem to be
>available.
>In today's NASA, I assume that with the outsourcing that has occurred
>all such information is the property of the companies that have built
>the Rover and therefore won't be released.
>If so it is a shame, I for one really do not understand why there has
>not been an increased interest in the Martian Rovers (note the lack of
>response to this discussion). I find it to be one of the most
>interesting robots around that is actually delivering on the promises
>made by its program. I would think that there would be a strong
>interest to build working models of it.
>TMT
|
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 > last >>
Related Posts
Latest Posts
|
|
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML site map